An exploratory analysis of the relationship between purchase category strategies and supply base structure

被引:24
作者
Ates, Melek Akin [1 ]
Wynstra, Finn [1 ]
van Raaij, Erik M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Supply base structure; Purchasing strategy; Purchase category; Multiple-case study; TRANSACTION COSTS; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE; CONTRACTS; PATTERNS; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article explores how purchasing strategy at the purchase category level is related to the structure of the supply base for that purchase category. We contrast cost strategies with innovation strategies, and define supply base structure as being comprised of size (number of suppliers), heterogeneity (differentiation of suppliers), interaction (competition/collaboration), time/stability (contract duration) and transparency (supplier information sharing). Examining 13 purchase categories by means of the multiple case study method, we find that supply base structures that are associated with higher purchasing performance are not only explained by differences in purchase category strategy, but also by the purchase category's impact and supply risk. We develop seven detailed propositions for future research on this complex interplay. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 219
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DEV SOURCING CAPABIL
[2]   The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices [J].
Awaysheh, Amrou ;
Klassen, Robert D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (12) :1246-1268
[3]   STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND PURCHASING EFFICACY: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THEIR IMPACT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
Baier, Christian ;
Hartmann, Evi ;
Moser, Roger .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (04) :36-52
[4]   Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications [J].
Barratt, Mark ;
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Li, Mei .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (04) :329-342
[5]   Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? [J].
Bensaou, M ;
Anderson, E .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :460-481
[6]   How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach [J].
Berger, PD ;
Gerstenfeld, A ;
Zeng, AZ .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 32 (01) :9-15
[7]   The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view [J].
Blome, Constantin ;
Schoenherr, Tobias ;
Eckstein, Dominik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 147 :307-316
[8]   AMBIDEXTROUS GOVERNANCE IN SUPPLY CHAINS: THE IMPACT ON INNOVATION AND COST PERFORMANCE [J].
Blome, Constantin ;
Schoenherr, Tobias ;
Kaesser, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2013, 49 (04) :59-80
[9]   A CONTINGENT RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE OF SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE AND ROBUSTNESS [J].
Brandon-Jones, Emma ;
Squire, Brian ;
Autry, Chad W. ;
Petersen, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2014, 50 (03) :55-73
[10]   Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies [J].
Burke, Gerard J. ;
Carrillo, Janice E. ;
Vakharia, Asoo J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :95-112