WHAT DOES THE CHICAGO SCHOOL TEACH ABOUT INTERNET SEARCH AND THE ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF GOOGLE?

被引:40
作者
Bork, Robert H. [1 ]
Sidak, J. Gregory [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US Court Appeals Dist Columbia Circuit, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[2] Criter Econ LLC, Washington, DC USA
[3] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Law & Econ Ctr TILEC, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
COMPETITION; MONOPOLY;
D O I
10.1093/joclec/nhs031
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Antitrust agencies in the United States and the European Union began investigating Googles search practices in 2010. Googles critics have consisted mainly of its competitors, particularly Microsoft, Yelp, TripAdvisor, and other search engines. They have alleged that Google is making it more difficult for them to compete by including specialized search results in general search pages and limiting access to search inputs, including scale, Google content, and the Android platform. Those claims contradict real-world experiences in search. They demonstrate competitors efforts to compete not by investing in efficiency, quality, or innovation, but by using antitrust law to punish the successful competitor. The Chicago School of law and economics teachesand the Supreme Court has long affirmedthat antitrust law exists to protect consumers, not competitors. Penalizing Googles practices as anticompetitive would violate that principle, reduce dynamic competition in search, and harm the consumers that the antitrust laws are intended to protect.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 700
页数:38
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   RELIABILITY OF PROGRESS CURVES IN AIRFRAME PRODUCTION [J].
ALCHIAN, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1963, 31 (04) :679-693
[2]  
Ammori Marvin, 2012, 2 ANN C COMP SEARCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], Our history in depth
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MICROSOFT EXPERTS AG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INDIA TODAY 0606
[6]  
[Anonymous], FACTS GOOGL COMP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, HEARING GOOGLE COMPE, P36
[8]  
[Anonymous], What is SEO / Search Engine Optimization?
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, VAL SUP BOWL AD PERF
[10]   SEARCH ENGINE COMPETITION WITH NETWORK EXTERNALITIES [J].
Argenton, Cedric ;
Pruefer, Jens .
JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2012, 8 (01) :73-105