Measurement of interaction strength innature

被引:321
作者
Wootton, JT [1 ]
Emmerson, M
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Dept Zool Ecol & Plant Sci, Cork, Ireland
关键词
allometry; energy flow; food web; modeling; scale;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175535
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding and predicting the dynamics of multispecies systems generally require estimates of interaction strength among species. Measuring interaction strength is difficult because of the large number of interactions in any natural system, long-term feedback, multiple pathways of effects between species pairs, and possible nonlinearities in interaction-strength functions. Presently, the few studies that extensively estimate interaction strength suggest that distributions of interaction strength tend to be skewed toward few strong and many weak interactions. Modeling studies indicate that such skewed patterns tend to promote system stability and arise during assembly of persistent communities. Methods for estimating interaction strength efficiently from traits of organisms, such as allometric relationships, show some promise. Methods for estimating community response to environmental perturbations without an estimate of interaction strength may also be of use. Spatial and temporal scale may affect patterns of interaction strength, but these effects require further investigation and new multispecies modeling frameworks. Future progress will be aided by development of long-term multispecies time series of natural communities, by experimental tests of different methods for estimating interaction strength, and by increased understanding of nonlinear functional forms.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 444
页数:26
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF HIGHER-ORDER INTERACTIONS [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1983, 121 (06) :887-891
[2]   Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator-prey coevolution [J].
Abrams, PA ;
Matsuda, H .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1996, 10 (02) :167-186
[3]   The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence [J].
Abrams, PA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2000, 31 :79-105
[4]   Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches [J].
Abrams, PA .
OIKOS, 2001, 94 (02) :209-218
[5]  
Abrams Peter A., 1996, P371
[6]   Neutral models fail to reproduce observed species-area and species-time relationships in Kansas grasslands [J].
Adler, PB .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (05) :1265-1272
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1935, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1096-3642.1935.TB01680.X
[8]  
[Anonymous], DYNAMIC FOOD WEBS MU
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Evolutionary dynamics of a natural population: The large cactus finch of the Galapagos
[10]   PERTURBATION EXPERIMENTS IN COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - THEORY AND PRACTICE [J].
BENDER, EA ;
CASE, TJ ;
GILPIN, ME .
ECOLOGY, 1984, 65 (01) :1-13