Replacement of dietary fat with sucrose polyester: Effects on energy intake and appetite control in nonobese males

被引:27
作者
Cotton, JR
Weststrate, JA
Blundell, JE
机构
[1] UNIV LEEDS, DEPT PSYCHOL, BIOPSYCHOL GRP, LEEDS LS2 9JT, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
[2] UNILEVER RES LABS VLAARDINGEN, 3130 AC VLAARDINGEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
appetite control; sucrose polyester; fat substitute; satiety;
D O I
10.1093/ajcn/63.6.891
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
In previous experiments using the fat substitute sucrose polyester (SPE, or olestra), no compensatory response was observed on day 2 after experimental manipulations, which reduced the percentage of energy from fat to approximate to 30% from 40% on day 1. In the present study a more severe manipulation was made; the amount of energy from fat was reduced from 32% to 20% to determine whether such a reduction would provoke any physiologic or behavioral response. Subjects came to the unit for two, 2-d test sessions. Intake on day 1 was fixed: subjects were given meals containing either control fat (11319 kJ, 32% of energy as fat) or SPE (9561 kJ, 20% of energy as fat). On day 2, intake was ad libitum. On day 1 subjects rated themselves as more hungry while consuming the fat-substituted meals than when consuming the control meals and they disclosed greater hunger in the end-of-day questionnaires. The effect of the manipulation was carried over into day 2. By the end of day 2, subjects had compensated for 74% of the energy (fat) deficit caused by the previous day's manipulation. These results differ from those obtained when fat was reduced from 40% to 30% of energy; this more severe reduction reveals that a reduction in fat of this size can lead to a biobehavioral response. Together, these data suggest that people could change their diet to meet dietary guidelines; however, if a more severe reduction is attempted, adherence may be made more difficult by the strength of the compensatory response.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 896
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   SAFETY EVALUATION OF OLESTRA, A NONABSORBED, FAT-LIKE FAT REPLACEMENT [J].
BERGHOLZ, CM .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 1992, 32 (02) :141-146
[2]   EFFECTS OF A NONENERGY FAT SUBSTITUTE ON CHILDRENS ENERGY AND MACRONUTRIENT INTAKE [J].
BIRCH, LL ;
JOHNSON, SL ;
JONES, MB ;
PETERS, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1993, 58 (03) :326-333
[3]  
BLUNDELL JE, 1991, PROG OBES R, P453
[4]  
Blundell John E., 1993, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, V57, p772S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/57.5.772S
[5]  
BURLEY VJ, 1992, OBESITY EUR, P63
[6]  
BURLEY VJ, 1994, OBESITY EUROPE 93, P213
[7]   HUMAN DIETARY RESPONSES TO COVERT MANIPULATIONS OF ENERGY, FAT, AND CARBOHYDRATE IN A MIDDAY MEAL [J].
CAPUTO, FA ;
MATTES, RD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1992, 56 (01) :36-43
[8]   DIETARY-FAT AND APPETITE - SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN THE SATIATING EFFECT OF MEALS SUPPLEMENTED WITH EITHER FAT OR CARBOHYDRATE [J].
COTTON, JR ;
BURLEY, VJ ;
WESTSTRATE, JA ;
BLUNDELL, JE .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 1994, 7 (01) :11-24
[9]  
COTTON JR, IN PRESS BR J NUTR
[10]  
COTTON JR, 1994, THESIS U LEEDS