Deep learning algorithm for surveillance of pneumothorax after lung biopsy: a multicenter diagnostic cohort study

被引:34
作者
Hwang, Eui Jin [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Jung Hee [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Kyung Hee [3 ]
Kim, Jung Im [4 ]
Nam, Ju Gang [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Da Som [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Hyewon [1 ,2 ]
Yoo, Seung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Goo, Jin Mo [1 ,2 ]
Park, Chang Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Inst Radiat Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, 82 Gumi Ro,173 Beon Gil, Seongnam Si 13620, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Radiol, 892 Dongnam Ro, Seoul 05278, South Korea
关键词
Thoracic radiography; Pneumothorax; Needle biopsy; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; CANCER; SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-06771-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Pneumothorax is the most common and potentially life-threatening complication arising from percutaneous lung biopsy. We evaluated the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detection of post-biopsy pneumothorax in chest radiographs (CRs), in consecutive cohorts reflecting actual clinical situation. Methods We retrospectively included post-biopsy CRs of 1757 consecutive patients (1055 men, 702 women; mean age of 65.1 years) undergoing percutaneous lung biopsies from three institutions. A commercially available deep learning algorithm analyzed each CR to identify pneumothorax. We compared the performance of the algorithm with that of radiology reports made in the actual clinical practice. We also conducted a reader study, in which the performance of the algorithm was compared with those of four radiologists. Performances of the algorithm and radiologists were evaluated by area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs), sensitivity, and specificity, with reference standards defined by thoracic radiologists. Results Pneumothorax occurred in 17.5% (308/1757) of cases, out of which 16.6% (51/308) required catheter drainage. The AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity of the algorithm were 0.937, 70.5%, and 97.7%, respectively, for identification of pneumothorax. The algorithm exhibited higher sensitivity (70.2% vs. 55.5%,p < 0.001) and lower specificity (97.7% vs. 99.8%,p < 0.001), compared with those of radiology reports. In the reader study, the algorithm exhibited lower sensitivity (77.3% vs. 81.8-97.7%) and higher specificity (97.6% vs. 81.7-96.0%) than the radiologists. Conclusion The deep learning algorithm appropriately identified pneumothorax in post-biopsy CRs in consecutive diagnostic cohorts. It may assist in accurate and timely diagnosis of post-biopsy pneumothorax in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3660 / 3671
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Annarumma M, 2019, RADIOLOGY, V291, P195, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2018180921
[2]   Management of spontaneous pneumothorax - An American College of Chest Physicians Delphi Consensus Statement [J].
Baumann, MH ;
Strange, C ;
Heffner, JE ;
Light, R ;
Kirby, TJ ;
Klein, J ;
Luketich, JD ;
Panacek, EA ;
Sahn, SA .
CHEST, 2001, 119 (02) :590-602
[3]   Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer [J].
Bejnordi, Babak Ehteshami ;
Veta, Mitko ;
van Diest, Paul Johannes ;
van Ginneken, Bram ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Litjens, Geert ;
van der Laak, Jeroen A. W. M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (22) :2199-2210
[4]   British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules [J].
Callister, M. E. J. ;
Baldwin, D. R. ;
Akram, A. R. ;
Barnard, S. ;
Cane, P. ;
Draffan, J. ;
Franks, K. ;
Gleeson, F. ;
Graham, R. ;
Malhotra, P. ;
Prokop, M. ;
Rodger, K. ;
Subesinghe, M. ;
Waller, D. ;
Woolhouse, I. .
THORAX, 2015, 70 :1-54
[5]   Pneumothorax size: Correlation of supine anteroposterior with erect posteroanterior chest radiographs [J].
Choi, BG ;
Park, SH ;
Yun, EH ;
Chae, KO ;
Shinn, KS .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) :567-569
[6]   Training and Validating a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Computer-Aided Detection and Classification of Abnormalities on Frontal Chest Radiographs [J].
Cicero, Mark ;
Bilbily, Alexander ;
Dowdell, Tim ;
Gray, Bruce ;
Perampaladas, Kuhan ;
Barfett, Joseph .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (05) :281-287
[7]   QUANTIFICATION OF PNEUMOTHORAX SIZE ON CHEST RADIOGRAPHS USING INTERPLEURAL DISTANCES - REGRESSION-ANALYSIS BASED ON VOLUME MEASUREMENTS FROM HELICAL CT [J].
COLLINS, CD ;
LOPEZ, A ;
MATHIE, A ;
WOOD, V ;
JACKSON, JE ;
RODDIE, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (05) :1127-1130
[8]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[9]   Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks [J].
Esteva, Andre ;
Kuprel, Brett ;
Novoa, Roberto A. ;
Ko, Justin ;
Swetter, Susan M. ;
Blau, Helen M. ;
Thrun, Sebastian .
NATURE, 2017, 542 (7639) :115-+
[10]   Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs [J].
Gulshan, Varun ;
Peng, Lily ;
Coram, Marc ;
Stumpe, Martin C. ;
Wu, Derek ;
Narayanaswamy, Arunachalam ;
Venugopalan, Subhashini ;
Widner, Kasumi ;
Madams, Tom ;
Cuadros, Jorge ;
Kim, Ramasamy ;
Raman, Rajiv ;
Nelson, Philip C. ;
Mega, Jessica L. ;
Webster, R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22) :2402-2410