Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output

被引:242
作者
Chiu, Ching-Ren [2 ]
Liou, Je-Liang [3 ]
Wu, Pei-Ing [4 ]
Fang, Chen-Ling [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Finance & Cooperat Management, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[3] Chung Hua Inst Econ Res, Int Div, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Taipei 106, Taiwan
关键词
Environmental efficiency; Meta-frontier inefficiency; Carbon dioxide emissions; Directional distance function; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; POWER-GENERATION; OECD COUNTRIES; SHADOW PRICES; CO2; EMISSIONS; EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; ENERGY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present an alternative analysis framework to evaluate the effects of technology heterogeneities and undesirable output on environmental efficiency measurement. The proposed framework combines the directional distance function and a meta-frontier analysis. It can be used to measure efficiency improvements brought about by enhanced technical management and technological advances. For demonstration purposes, we used the framework to measure the environmental efficiency in 90 countries worldwide for the 2003-2007 period. The results showed that when the meta-technology set is used as the evaluation basis, the average environmental efficiency of high competitiveness countries is greater than that of lower-middle, low, and upper-middle competitiveness countries. The upper-middle competitiveness countries perform worse than the lower-middle and low competitiveness countries because of the excessive labor force usage and carbon dioxide emissions in these countries. We also found that the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier for high competitiveness countries can be attributed to managerial failure in the production process, whereas that for upper-middle, lower-middle, and low competitiveness countries can be attributed to technological differences. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1392 / 1399
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The productivity and efficiency of the Australian electricity supply industry [J].
Abbott, Malcolm .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (04) :444-454
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIM AN IND TOOL DAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MEASUREMENT PRODUCTI
[5]   Productivity differences across OECD countries in the presence of environmental constraints [J].
Arcelus, F ;
Arocena, P .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (12) :1352-1362
[6]   Technical efficiency of thermoelectric power plants [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Peypoch, Nicolas .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) :3118-3127
[7]   Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants: A case study for Portugal [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (01) :59-75
[8]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[9]  
Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87
[10]   Plant level productivity, efficiency, and environmental performance of the container glass industry [J].
Boyd, GA ;
Tolley, G ;
Pang, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (01) :29-43