The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity

被引:735
作者
Friedman, RS [1 ]
Förster, J
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Wurzburg, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study tested whether cues associated with promotion and prevention regulatory foci influence creativity. The authors predicted that the "risky," explorative processing style elicited by promotion cues, relative to the risk-averse, perseverant processing style elicited by prevention cues, would facilitate creative thought. These predictions were supported by two experiments in which promotion cues bolstered both creative insight (Experiment 1) and creative generation (Experiment 2) relative to prevention cues. Experiments 3 and 4 provided evidence for the process account of these findings, suggesting that promotion cues, relative to prevention cues, produce a riskier response bias (Experiment 3) and bolster memory search for novel responses (Experiment 4). A final experiment provided evidence that individual differences in regulatory focus influence creative problem solving in a manner analogous to that of incidental promotion and prevention cues.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1013
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[2]  
Anderson MC., 1996, Memory, P237, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-012102570-0/50010-0, 10.1016/B978-012102570-0/50010-0]
[3]  
Anderson Michael C., 1994, P265
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOL CREAT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8_3
[5]   A REVIEW OF THE TIP-OF-THE-TONGUE EXPERIENCE [J].
BROWN, AS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (02) :204-223
[6]  
CACIOPPO JT, 1993, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V65, P5
[7]  
Clore G. L., 1994, Handbook of social cognition: basic processes
[8]  
applications, P323
[9]  
CLORE GL, 1994, NATURE EMOTION FUNDA, P386
[10]   Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making [J].
Crowe, E ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 69 (02) :117-132