Fiduciary obligation in clinical research

被引：53

作者：

Miller, Paul B. ^{[1
]}

Weijer, Charles

机构：

[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Philosophy, Toronto, ON, Canada

[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Philosophy, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada

[3] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Med, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada

来源：

JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS | 2006年 / 34卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00049.x

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Heated debate surrounds the question whether the relationship between physician-researcher and patient-subject is governed by a duty of care. Miller and Weijer argue that fiduciary law provides a strong legal foundation for this duty, and for articulating the terms of the relationship between physician-researcher and patient-subject.

引用

页码：424 / +

页数：18

共 61 条

[1]

[Anonymous], CALIF L REV

[2]

[Anonymous], LQ REV

[3]

Bartlett P, 1997, Med Law Rev, V5, P193

[4]

BIRKS P, 1997, PRIVACY LOYALTY, P269

[5]

BIRKS P, 2000, ISRAEL LAW REV, V34, P28

[6]

BRODY H, 2003, KENNEDY INST ETHIC J, V13, P334

[7] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, AGENCY COSTS, AND THE RHETORIC OF CONTRACT [J].

BRUDNEY, V .

COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1985, 85 (07) :1403-1444

[8]

BRUDNEY V, 1996, BOSTON COLL LAW REV, V38, P595

[9]

BURROWS A, 2002, OXFORD J LEGAL STUDI, V22, P8

[10]

CHAPMAN B, 1993, U TORONTO LJ, V43, P547, DOI DOI 10.2307/825720

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →