Nonlinear ΔR2* Effects in Perfusion Quantification Using Bolus-Tracking MRI

被引:36
作者
Calamante, Fernando [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Connelly, Alan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Osch, Matthias J. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brain Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Florey Neurosci Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiol, Ctr Med, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
bolus tracking MRI; cerebral blood flow; contrast agent concentration; perfusion; quantification; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; GRADIENT-ECHO; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.21839
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI involves injection of a contrast agent, whose concentration is estimated from Delta R-2* changes. However, measurement of contrast-agent concentration is prone to various sources of error; in particular, the commonly assumed linear relationship between contrast agent concentration and Delta R-2* in arterial blood is known to be invalid. In this study, we characterized the associated perfusion errors. Large errors were found when the linear assumption is used; these errors were highly dependent on the choice of tissue relaxivity. The errors were greatly reduced when using the quadratic model, and were further reduced when quantifying perfusion as a relative measure. This study suggests the linear assumption should be abandoned in favor of the quadratic model. Thus, the errors are minimized leading to improved quantification that will enable perfusion MRI to continue to play an important role in quantifying perfusion in brain diseases (e.g., acute stroke). Magn Reson Med 61:486-492, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 492
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AKBUDAK E, 1998, P 6 ANN M ISMRM SYDN
[2]   Bolus delay and dispersion in perfusion MRI: Implications for tissue predictor models in stroke [J].
Calamante, F ;
Willats, L ;
Gadian, DG ;
Connelly, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 55 (05) :1180-1185
[3]   Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques [J].
Calamante, F ;
Thomas, DL ;
Pell, GS ;
Wiersma, J ;
Turner, R .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1999, 19 (07) :701-735
[4]  
Calamante F, 2000, MAGN RESON MED, V44, P466, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200009)44:3<466::AID-MRM18>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-M
[6]   Contrast agent concentration measurements affecting quantification of bolus-tracking perfusion MRI [J].
Calamante, Fernando ;
Vonken, Evert-jan P. A. ;
van Osch, Matthias J. P. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 58 (03) :544-553
[7]   Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarct [J].
Hjort, N ;
Butcher, K ;
Davis, SM ;
Kidwell, CS ;
Koroshetz, WJ ;
Röther, J ;
Schellinger, PD ;
Warach, S ;
Ostergaard, L .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (02) :388-397
[8]   Identifying systematic errors in quantitative dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging by high-resolution multi-echo parallel EPI [J].
Jochimsen, Thies H. ;
Newbould, Rexford D. ;
Skare, Stefan T. ;
Clayton, David B. ;
Albers, Gregory W. ;
Moseley, Michael E. ;
Bammer, Roland .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (04) :429-438
[9]  
Johnson KM, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P909, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<909::AID-MRM12>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-U