Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION5 Item

被引:150
作者
Elwyn, Glyn [1 ,2 ]
Tsulukidze, Maka [1 ]
Edwards, Adrian [2 ]
Legare, France [3 ]
Newcombe, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dartmouth Ctr Hlth Care Delivery Sci, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Cardiff Univ, Cochrane Inst Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Cardiff CF10 3AX, S Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
Shared decision making; Patient involvement; Measurement; Process measure; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; INTEGRATIVE MODEL; GENERAL-PRACTICE; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; INVOLVEMENT; INTERVENTIONS; CONSULTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To propose a revised Observer OPTION measure of shared decision making. Methods: We analyzed published models to identify the core components of a parsimonious conceptual framework of shared decision making. By using this framework, we developed a revised measure combining data from an observational study of clinical practice-in Canada with our experience of using Observer OPTION12 (Item) Results: Our conceptual framework for shared decision making composed of justifying deliberative work, followed by the steps of describing options, information exchange, preference elicitation, and preference integration. By excluding items in Observer OPTION12 (Item) that were seldom observed or not aligned to a robust construct, we propose Observer OPTION5 (Item). Conclusion: Although widely used, Observer OPTION12 Item did not give sufficient attention to preference elicitation and integration, and included items that were not specific to a core construct of shared decision making. We attempted to remedy these shortcomings by proposing a shorter, more focused measure. Practice implications: Observer OPTION5 (Item) requires evaluation; we hope that it will be useful as both a research tool and as a formative measure of clinical practice. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 271
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HLTH EXPECT
[2]   Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: A study of videotaped General Practice consultations with hypertension patients [J].
Bensing J.M. ;
Tromp F. ;
Van Dulmen S. ;
Van Den Brink-Muinen A. ;
Verheul W. ;
Schellevis F.G. .
BMC Family Practice, 7 (1)
[3]  
Braddock CH, 1997, J GEN INTERN MED, V12, P339, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00057.x
[4]   Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics [J].
Braddock, CH ;
Edwards, KA ;
Hasenberg, NM ;
Laidley, TL ;
Levinson, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24) :2313-2320
[5]   President's Page: Employing Shared Decision-Making Models to Improve Care and Patient Value: A Cardiovascular Professional Initiative [J].
Brindis, Ralph ;
Spertus, John A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (24) :2046-2048
[6]   What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? [J].
Charles, C ;
Whelan, T ;
Gafni, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :780-782
[7]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[8]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[9]  
Coulter A, 1997, J Health Serv Res Policy, V2, P112
[10]   Sharing decisions with patients: Is the information good enough? [J].
Coulter, A ;
Entwistle, V ;
Gilbert, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7179) :318-322