The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect

被引:313
作者
Turnley, WH
Feldman, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Coll Business Adm, Dept Management, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Management, Coll Business Adm, Manhattan, KS 66503 USA
关键词
psychological contract; psychological contract violation;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016971222029
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines the relationships between violations of employees' psychological contracts and their exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect behaviors. Using a sample of over 800 managers, this research found that psychological contract violations result in increased levels of exit, voice, and neglect behaviors and decreased levels of loyalty to the organization. In addition, this research examines the moderating effects that situational factors (such as the availability of attractive employment alternatives) have on the relationships between psychological contract violations and managers' behaviors. The results suggest that these situational factors moderate the relationship between psychological contract violations and exit, but not the relationships between psychological contract violations and voice, loyalty, or neglect. Finally, this research also examines differences in the nature of psychological contract violations experienced across three categories of workers: new managers entering the workforce, expatriates and managers in international business, and managers working in downsizing or restructuring firms. The results suggest that psychological contract violations are both more frequent and more intense among managers working in downsizing or restructuring firms, particularly in terms of job security, compensation, and opportunities for advancement.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 922
页数:28
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]   CORRELATES OF UNIVERSITY-FACULTY INTEREST IN UNIONIZATION - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION [J].
ALLEN, RE ;
KEAVENY, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (05) :582-588
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1965, ORG PSYCHOL
[4]  
Argyris C., 1960, UNDERSTANDING ORG BE
[5]  
Bies RJ, 1986, RES NEGOTIATION ORG, P43, DOI DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
[6]  
Blau P.M., 1964, SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEO
[7]  
BROCKNER J, 1990, J EXPT SOCIAL PSYCHO, V26, P289
[8]   CONTROL-THEORY - A USEFUL CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK FOR PERSONALITY-SOCIAL, CLINICAL, AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY [J].
CARVER, CS ;
SCHEIER, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (01) :111-135
[10]   CONTINGENCY THEORY OF SOCIALIZATION [J].
FELDMAN, DC .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1976, 21 (03) :433-452