Supply Chain Disruption Management: Severe Events, Recovery, and Performance

被引:104
作者
Macdonald, John R. [1 ]
Corsi, Thomas M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
disruption management; recovery; risk management; supply chain; RISK-MANAGEMENT; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; MITIGATION; GLITCHES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jbl.12026
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Given their proclivity to occur despite managers' best efforts, disruptions often result in lost sales, lead to large financial losses, and have a negative impact on shareholder wealth and operating performance. Less attention, however, has been paid to improving the process of managing a disruption from its discovery through to complete recovery. This entire process is not, in fact, fully understood. Clearer insights are needed surrounding the following issues: factors influencing the recovery process, how those factors interact to play a role in managerial decision making, and the company's actual ability to recover. While it is possible to determine basic recovery process factors, a more complete picture of disruption management can be built from analysis of data collected through qualitative in-depth interviews. This research delivers insights around the interactions and relationships among factors, providing the foundation for a set of propositions useful for further investigation in the following areas: discovery of the disruption event, causes of the event, and recovery performance. One finding indicates that while internal disruptions are faster to recover from, they more likely lead to negative perceptions about the recovery performance outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 288
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Supply chain security orientation: conceptual development and a proposed framework [J].
Autry, Chad W. ;
Bobbitt, L. Michelle .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 19 (01) :42-64
[2]   Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions [J].
Bendoly, Elliot ;
Donohue, Karen ;
Schultz, Kenneth L. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 24 (06) :737-752
[3]   Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions [J].
Bhamra, Ran ;
Dani, Samir ;
Burnard, Kevin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) :5375-5393
[4]   An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions [J].
Blackhurst, J ;
Craighead, CW ;
Elkins, D ;
Handfield, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (19) :4067-4081
[5]   Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry [J].
Blackhurst, Jennifer V. ;
Scheibe, Kevin P. ;
Johnson, Danny J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (02) :143-165
[6]   UNDERSTANDING RESPONSES TO SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS: INSIGHTS FROM INFORMATION PROCESSING AND RESOURCE DEPENDENCE PERSPECTIVES [J].
Bode, Christoph ;
Wagner, Stephan M. ;
Petersen, Kenneth J. ;
Ellram, Lisa M. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (04) :833-856
[7]  
Boin A., 2004, INT STUD REV, V6, P165, DOI [DOI 10.1111/MISR.2004.6.ISSUE-1, 10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.393_2.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1521-9488.2004.393_2.X]
[8]  
Chapman Paul., 2002, LOGISTICS TRANSPORT, V4, P59
[9]   Cohesion and Performance A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams [J].
Chiocchio, Francois ;
Essiembre, Helene .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2009, 40 (04) :382-420
[10]  
Chopra S, 2004, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V46, P53