What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability

被引:1132
作者
Smith, Adrian [1 ]
Raven, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, SPRU, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Sch Innovat Sci, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Niche; Protective space; Empowerment; Narratives; Sustainability; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION SYSTEMS; FIELD-CONFIGURING EVENTS; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; NURTURED NICHES; TECHNO THERAPY; BOUNDARY-WORK; POLICY; TRAJECTORIES; EXPECTATIONS; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1036
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Clean Energy Progress Report
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, DEMOCRACY DIFFERENCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Technological Change and Company Strategies
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STEPS Working Paper 2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MISS STAT RES AG SUS
[6]   Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Rotmans, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2009, 12 (04) :543-569
[7]  
Basalla G., 1988, EVOLUTION TECHNOLOGY
[8]  
Bastos MariaInes., 1995, POLITICS TECHNOLOGY
[9]   How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Leca, Bernard ;
Boxenbaum, Eva .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2009, 3 :65-107
[10]   Time and technological learning in industrialising countries: how long does it take? How fast is it moving (if at all)? [J].
Bell, Martin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (1-3) :25-39