Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison of Random and Targeted Biopsies

被引:230
作者
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry [1 ]
Peyromaure, Michael [1 ]
Schull, Alexandre [2 ]
Beuvon, Frederic [3 ]
Bouazza, Naim [4 ]
Flam, Thierry [1 ]
Zerbib, Marc [1 ]
Muradyan, Naira [7 ]
Legman, Paul [2 ]
Cornud, Francois [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Cochin Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Urol, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Cochin Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Radiol, F-75014 Paris, France
[3] Cochin Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Pathol, F-75014 Paris, France
[4] Tarnier Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Clin Res, Paris, France
[5] Paris Descartes Univ, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
[6] Tourville Imaging Ctr, Paris, France
[7] iCAD Inc, Nashua, NH USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; TUMOR VOLUME; MR;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.195
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the accuracy of visual targeted biopsies vs computerized transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging registration using a rigid (Esaote (R), nondeformable) or elastic (Koelis (R)), deformable) approach. Materials and Methods: A total of 391 consecutive patients with suspected localized prostate cancer were prospectively included in analysis. All patients underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging, followed by 10 to 12-core random prostate biopsies. When magnetic resonance imaging detected suspicious findings, targeted biopsy was performed, including visual, rigid system and elastic system targeted biopsies in the first 127 patients, the next 131 and the last 133, respectively. Cancer detection rates were assessed by conditional logistic regression. Targeted biopsies alone and random biopsies were further compared for the amount of tissue sampled and microfocal cancer detection, the latter defined as a single core with 5 mm or less of Gleason 6 cancer. Results: Patient characteristics and random biopsy detection rates were similar among the groups. Magnetic resonance imaging detected at least 1 suspicious area in 54 (42%), 78 (59%) and 82 patients (62%) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The cancer detection rates of rigid and elastic system targeted biopsies were significantly higher than the random biopsy rate (p = 0.0065 and 0.0016, respectively). Visual targeted biopsy did not perform better than random biopsy (p = 0.66). Rigid and elastic system targeted biopsies allowed for decreasing the number of cores and the detection of microfocal cancer, while increasing the detection of high grade cancer. Conclusions: When performed with computerized magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image registration, targeted biopsy alone improved cancer detection over random biopsies, decreased the detection rate of microfocal cancer and increased the detection rate of cancer with a Gleason score of greater than 6.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 499
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR UROL
[2]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[3]   Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation [J].
Baumann, Michael ;
Mozer, Pierre ;
Daanen, Vincent ;
Troccaz, Jocelyne .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2012, 16 (03) :562-576
[4]   Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Rouanne, Mathieu ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Liberatore, Mathieu ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Cornud, Francois .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (09) :1411-1418
[5]   Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: A systematic review [J].
Eichler, K ;
Hempel, S ;
Wilby, J ;
Myers, L ;
Bachmann, LM ;
Kleijnen, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05) :1605-1612
[6]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[7]   Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: Sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence [J].
Haas, Gabriel P. ;
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Jones, Richard F. ;
Chandan, Vishal ;
Serio, Angel M. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Jumbelic, Mary ;
Threatte, Gregory ;
Korets, Rus ;
Lilja, Hans ;
de la Roza, Gustavo .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (19) :1484-1489
[8]   Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection [J].
Haffner, Jeremie ;
Lemaitre, Laurent ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Leroy, Xavier ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Villers, Arnauld .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E171-E178
[9]   Prospective Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using 3-T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsies Versus a Systematic 10-Core Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy Cohort [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Hoeks, Caroline ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina ;
Scheenen, Tom ;
Futterer, Jurgen ;
Bouwense, Stefan ;
van Oort, Inge ;
Schroder, Fritz ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
Barentsz, Jelle .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (01) :177-184
[10]   MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions [J].
Hu, Yipeng ;
Ahmed, Hashirn Uddin ;
Taylor, Zeike ;
Allen, Clare ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Hawkes, David ;
Barratt, Dean .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2012, 16 (03) :687-703