Does retailer power lead to exclusion?

被引:27
作者
Rey, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Whinston, Michael D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Sch Econ, GREMAQ, Toulouse, France
[2] Toulouse Sch Econ, IDEI, Toulouse, France
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
EXTERNALITIES;
D O I
10.1111/1756-2171.12011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines whether retailer bargaining power and upfront slotting allowances prevent small manufacturers (who have no bargaining power) from obtaining adequate distribution. In contrast to the findings of , who show that all equilibria involve limited distribution (i.e., exclusion of a retailer), we show that there is always an equilibrium in which full distribution is obtained, provided that full distribution is the industry profit-maximizing outcome. The key feature leading to this differing result is that we do not restrict each retailer to offering the manufacturer a single tariff.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:7
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Martimort D., 2003, ADV THEORETICAL EC, V3
[2]  
Marx LM, 2007, RAND J ECON, V38, P823, DOI 10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00114.x
[3]   BUYER POWER AND INTRABRAND COORDINATION [J].
Miklos-Thal, Jeanine ;
Rey, Patrick ;
Verge, Thibaud .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, 9 (04) :721-741
[4]  
Rey P., 2011, 0111 NW U CTR STUD I
[5]   Robust predictions for bilateral contracting with externalities [J].
Segal, I ;
Whinston, MD .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (03) :757-791
[6]   Contracting with externalities [J].
Segal, I .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (02) :337-388