Engineering bureaucracy: The genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in high-technology firms

被引:122
作者
Baron, JN [1 ]
Burton, MD
Hannan, MT
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jleo/15.1.1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the impact of organizational founding conditions on several facets of bureaucratization-managerial intensity, the proliferation of specialized managerial and administrative roles, and formalization of employment relations. Analyzing information on a sample of technology start-ups in California's Silicon Valley, we characterize the organizational models or blueprints espoused by founders in creating new enterprises. We find that those models and the social composition of the labor force at the time of founding had enduring effects on growth in managerial intensity (i.e., reliance on managerial and administrative specialists) over time. Our analyses thus provide compelling evidence of path dependence in the evolution of bureaucracy-even in a context in which firms face intense selection pressures-and underscore the importance of the "logics of organizing" that founders bring to new enterprises. We find less evidence that founding models exert persistent effects on the formalization of employment relations or on the proliferation of specialized senior management titles. Rather, consistent with neo-institutional perspectives on organizations, those superficial facets of bureaucracy appear to be shaped by the need to satisfy external gatekeepers (venture capitalists and the constituents of public corporations). as well as by exigencies of organizational scale, growth, and aging. We discuss some implications of these results for efforts to understand the varieties, determinants, and consequences of bureaucracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 41
页数:41
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[2]  
Baron J.N., 1996, Industrial and Corporate Change, V5, P239, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/5.2.239
[3]   THE STRUCTURE OF OPPORTUNITY - HOW PROMOTION LADDERS VARY WITHIN AND AMONG ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BARON, JN ;
DAVISBLAKE, A ;
BIELBY, WT .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1986, 31 (02) :248-273
[4]   THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONS AND INEQUALITY [J].
BARON, JN ;
PFEFFER, J .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1994, 57 (03) :190-209
[5]   TARGETS OF OPPORTUNITY - ORGANIZATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF GENDER INTEGRATION WITHIN THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL-SERVICE, 1979-1985 [J].
BARON, JN ;
MITTMAN, BS ;
NEWMAN, AE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1991, 96 (06) :1362-1401
[6]  
BARON JN, 1998, 98064 HARV BUS SCH
[7]  
Boeker W., 1988, ECOLOGICAL MODELS OR, P33
[8]  
BURTON MD, 1998, UNPUB EMPLOYMENT MOD
[9]  
BURTON MD, 1995, THESIS STANFORD U
[10]  
Edvinsson L., 1997, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL