Nonfarm diversification, poverty, economic mobility, and income inequality: a case study in village India

被引:56
作者
Himanshu [1 ]
Lanjouw, Peter [2 ]
Murgai, Rinku [2 ]
Stern, Nicholas [3 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, New Delhi 110067, India
[2] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[3] London Sch Econ, London WC2 2AE, England
关键词
Rural diversification; Non-farm employment; Village study; Income inequality; Poverty; Income mobility; 018; 015; I32; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12029
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article assembles data at the all-India level and for the village of Palanpur, Uttar Pradesh, to document the growing importance, and influence, of the nonfarm sector in the rural economy between the early 1980s and late 2000s. The suggestion from the combined National Sample Survey and Palanpur data is of a slow process of nonfarm diversification, whose distributional incidence, on the margin, is increasingly pro-poor. The village-level analysis documents that the nonfarm sector is not only increasing incomes and reducing poverty, but appears as well to be breaking down long-standing barriers to mobility among the poorest segments of rural society. Efforts by the government of India to accelerate the process of diversification could thus yield significant returns in terms of declining poverty and increased income mobility. The evidence from Palanpur also shows, however, that at the village-level a significant increase in income inequality has accompanied diversification away from the farm. A growing literature argues that such a rise in inequality could affect the fabric of village society, the way in which village institutions function and evolve, and the scope for collective action at the village level. Failure to keep such inequalities in check could thus undermine the pro-poor impacts from the process of structural transformation currently underway in rural India.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 473
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TRANSFORMING RURAL N
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, AGR DEV IND RU UNPUB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Perspectives on Poverty in India: Stylized Facts from Survey Data
[4]  
Bliss C., 1982, PALANPUR EC INDIAN V
[5]   DECOMPOSABLE INCOME INEQUALITY MEASURES [J].
BOURGUIGNON, F .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (04) :901-920
[6]  
Cai J, 2008, RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IND
[7]   ON THE STRUCTURE OF ADDITIVE INEQUALITY MEASURES [J].
COWELL, FA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (03) :521-531
[8]   Does caste still define disparity? A look at inequality in Kerala, India [J].
Deshpande, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (02) :322-325
[9]  
Dubey A., 2008, CONSUMPTION INCOME I
[10]  
Dumont L, 1966, HOMOHEIRARCHICUS CAS