Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities

被引:4171
作者
Zollo, M [1 ]
Winter, SG
机构
[1] INSEAD, Dept Strategy & Management, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Management, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
organizational learning; dynamic capabilities; organizational routines; knowledge codification; knowledge articulation; learning by doing; task frequency; task heterogeneity; causal ambiguity;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the mechanisms through which organizations develop dynamic capabilities, defined as routinized activities directed to the development and adaptation of operating routines. It addresses the role of (1) experience accumulation, (2) knowledge articulation, and (3) knowledge codification processes in the evolution of dynamic, as well as operational, routines. The argument is made that dynamic capabilities are shaped by the coevolution of these learning mechanisms. At any point in time, firms adopt a mix of learning behaviors constituted by a semiautomatic accumulation of experience and by deliberate investments in knowledge articuation and codification activities. The relative effectiveness of these capability-building mechanisms is analyzed here as contingent upon selected features of the task to be learned, such as its frequency, homogeneity, and degree of causal ambiguity. Testable hypotheses about these effects are derived. Somewhat counterintuitive implications of the analysis include the relatively superior effectiveness of highly deliberate learning processes such as knowledge codification at lower levels of frequency and homogeneity of the organizational task, in contrast with common managerial practice.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 351
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Organizational learning, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1985.4279103
[3]  
Argote Linda., 2012, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, V2nd
[4]  
Boisot M.H., 1998, KNOWLEDGE ASSETS SEC
[5]   ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND COMMUNITIES-OF-PRACTICE: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW OF WORKING, LEARNING, AND INNOVATION [J].
Brown, John Seely ;
Duguid, Paul .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (01) :40-57
[6]   The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34
[7]  
CAMPBELL DT, 1969, GEN SYST, V14, P69
[8]   ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING - OBSERVATIONS TOWARD A THEORY [J].
CANGELOSI, VE ;
DILL, WR .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1965, 10 (02) :175-203
[9]   ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES ARE STORED AS PROCEDURAL MEMORY - EVIDENCE FROM A LABORATORY STUDY [J].
COHEN, MD ;
BACDAYAN, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (04) :554-568
[10]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152