Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy

被引:7752
作者
Friesner, RA [1 ]
Banks, JL
Murphy, RB
Halgren, TA
Klicic, JJ
Mainz, DT
Repasky, MP
Knoll, EH
Shelley, M
Perry, JK
Shaw, DE
Francis, P
Shenkin, PS
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Chem, New York, NY 10036 USA
[2] Schrodinger LLC, New York, NY 10036 USA
[3] Schrodinger LLC, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] DE Shaw Res & Dev, New York, NY 10036 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jm0306430
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Unlike other methods for docking ligands to the rigid 3D structure of a known protein receptor, Glide approximates a complete systematic search of the conformational, orientational, and positional space of the docked ligand. In this search, an initial rough positioning and scoring phase that dramatically narrows the search space is followed by torsionally flexible energy optimization on an OPLS-AA nonbonded potential grid for a few hundred surviving candidate poses. The very best candidates are further refined via a Monte Carlo sampling of pose conformation; in some cases, this is crucial to obtaining an accurate docked pose. Selection of the best docked pose uses a model energy function that combines empirical and force-field-based terms. Docking accuracy is assessed by redocking ligands from 282 cocrystallized PDB complexes starting from conformationally optimized ligand geometries that bear no memory of the correctly docked pose. Errors in geometry for the top-ranked pose are less than 1 Angstrom in nearly half of the cases and are greater than 2 Angstrom in only about one-third of them. Comparisons to published data on rms deviations show that Glide is nearly twice as accurate as GOLD and more than twice as accurate as FlexX for ligands having up to 20 rotatable bonds. Glide is also found to be more accurate than the recently described Surflex method.
引用
收藏
页码:1739 / 1749
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   High-throughput docking for lead generation [J].
Abagyan, R ;
Totrov, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (04) :375-382
[2]   Molecular recognition of protein-ligand complexes: Applications to drug design [J].
Babine, RE ;
Bender, SL .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1997, 97 (05) :1359-1472
[3]   3-aminopyrrolidinone farnesyltransferase inhibitors: Design of macrocyclic compounds with improved pharmacokinetics and excellent cell potency [J].
Bell, IM ;
Gallicchio, SN ;
Abrams, M ;
Beese, LS ;
Beshore, DC ;
Bhimnathwala, H ;
Bogusky, MJ ;
Buser, CA ;
Culberson, JC ;
Davide, J ;
Ellis-Hutchings, M ;
Fernandes, C ;
Gibbs, JB ;
Graham, SL ;
Hamilton, KA ;
Hartman, GD ;
Heimbrook, DC ;
Homnick, CF ;
Huber, HE ;
Huff, JR ;
Kassahun, K ;
Koblan, KS ;
Kohl, NE ;
Lobell, RB ;
Lynch, JJ ;
Robinson, R ;
Rodrigues, AD ;
Taylor, JS ;
Walsh, ES ;
Williams, TM ;
Zartman, CB .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 45 (12) :2388-2409
[4]   Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations [J].
Bissantz, C ;
Folkers, G ;
Rognan, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (25) :4759-4767
[5]   Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins [J].
Charifson, PS ;
Corkery, JJ ;
Murcko, MA ;
Walters, WP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (25) :5100-5109
[6]   Empirical scoring functions .1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes [J].
Eldridge, MD ;
Murray, CW ;
Auton, TR ;
Paolini, GV ;
Mee, RP .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1997, 11 (05) :425-445
[7]   DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases [J].
Ewing, TJA ;
Makino, S ;
Skillman, AG ;
Kuntz, ID .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) :411-428
[8]  
Gasteiger J., 1990, TetrahedronComput. Methodol, V3, P537, DOI DOI 10.1016/0898-5529(90)90156-3
[9]  
Halgren TA, 1999, J COMPUT CHEM, V20, P720, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199905)20:7<720::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-X