Premedication in the United States: A status report

被引:125
作者
Kain, ZN
Mayes, LC
Bell, C
Weisman, S
Hofstadter, MB
Rimar, S
机构
[1] YALE UNIV,SCH MED,YALE CHILD STUDY CTR,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
[2] YALE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
[3] YALE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PSYCHOL,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199702000-00035
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We undertook a mailing survey study to assess the current practice of sedative premedication in anesthesia. A total of 5396 questionnaires were mailed to randomly selected physician members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Forty-six percent (n = 2421) of those sampled returned the questionnaire after two mailings. The reported rate of sedative premedication in the United States varied widely among age groups and geographical locations. Premedicant sedative drugs were least often used with children younger than age 3 years and most often used with adults less than 65 years of age (25% vs 75%, P = 0.001). Midazolam was the most frequently used premedicant both in adults and children (>75%). When analyzed based on geographical locations, use of sedative premedicants among adults was least frequent in the Northeast region and most frequent in the Southeast region (50% vs 90%, P = 0.001). When the frequency of premedication was examined against health maintenance organization (HMO) penetration (i.e., HMO enrollment by total population) in the various geographical regions, correlation coefficients (r) ranged from -0.96 to -0.54. Multivariable analysis revealed that HMO penetration is an independent predictor for the use of premedication in adults and children. The marked variation among geographical areas in premedicant usage patterns underscores the lack of consensus among anesthesiologists about the need for premedication. The data suggest that HMO participation may affect delivery of this component of anesthetic care.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ALREC P, 1995, SURVEY RES HDB, P113
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH CARE HUMAN BEHA
[3]   Standards of care [J].
Argy, O .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (17) :1296-1296
[4]   PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY - DETECTION AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS [J].
BADNER, NH ;
NIELSON, WR ;
MUNK, S ;
KWIATKOWSKA, C ;
GELB, AW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (04) :444-447
[5]   CATHETER REMOVAL OF BLUNT ESOPHAGEAL FOREIGN-BODIES IN CHILDREN - SURVEY OF THE SOCIETY-FOR-PEDIATRIC-RADIOLOGY [J].
CAMPBELL, JB ;
CONDON, VR .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1989, 19 (6-7) :361-365
[6]   PRODUCTION PRESSURE IN THE WORK-ENVIRONMENT - CALIFORNIA ANESTHESIOLOGISTS ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES [J].
GABA, DM ;
HOWARD, SK ;
JUMP, B .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (02) :488-500
[7]  
HOLT S, 1985, BRIT MED J, V291, P673, DOI 10.1136/bmj.291.6496.673
[8]  
Johnston M, 1986, Adv Psychosom Med, V15, P1
[9]   Preoperative anxiety in children - Predictors and outcomes [J].
Kain, ZN ;
Mayes, LC ;
OConnor, TZ ;
Cicchetti, DV .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1996, 150 (12) :1238-1245
[10]   Parental presence during induction of anaesthesia: Practice differences between the United States and Great Britain [J].
Kain, ZN ;
Ferris, CA ;
Mayes, LC ;
Rimar, S .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 6 (03) :187-193