Valuation of Internet stocks - An IPO perspective

We empitically investigate valuations of Internet firms at various stages of the initial public offering (IPO) from two perspectives. First, we examine the association between the valuation of Internet IPOs and a set of financial and nonfinancial variables, which prior anecdotal or empirical evidence suggests may serve as N-glue drivers. Second, we document differences in IPO valuations between Internet and non-Internet firms as well as across different stages in the IPO process-i.e., initial prospectus price, final offer price, and first trading day price-within each set of firms. Our primary two conclusions are as follows. First, there are noticeable differences between valuations of Internet and note-Internet firms, especially at the prospectus and fit-tal IPO stage. Specifically, the valuation of non-Internet firms generally follows the conventional wisdom regarding valuation: positive earnings and cash flows are priced, while negative earnings and negative cash flows are not. The valuation of Internet firms, however, departs from conventional wisdom, with earnings not being priced, and negative cash flows being priced perhaps because they are viewed as investments. This difference between the two classes of firms may he expected, given tire age and unique nature of the Internet industry. Second, there are significant differences between the initial valuation of firms at the prospectus and IPO stage and their valuation by the stock market at the end of the first trading day. For non-Internet firms, the difference is largely ascribed to the relative offering size. For Internet firms, however, the differences are with respect to positive cash flows, sales growth, R&D, and high-risk warnings, in addition to the relative offering size.