The impact of network embeddedness on research output

被引:202
作者
Gonzalez-Brambila, Claudia N. [1 ]
Veloso, Francisco M. [2 ,3 ]
Krackhardt, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Tecnol Autonomo Mexico, Sch Business, Mexico City 01080, DF, Mexico
[2] Catolica Lisbon Sch Business & Econ, P-1649023 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Heinz Coll, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Network embeddedness; Research output and impact; Mexico; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; STRUCTURAL HOLES; CO-AUTHORSHIP; TIES; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; ECONOMICS; BROKERAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper aims to further our understanding of how embeddedness affects the research output and impact of scientists. The analysis uses an extensive panel data that allows an analysis of within person variation overtime, It explores the simultaneous effects of different dimensions of network embeddedness over time at individual level. These include the establishment of direct ties, the strengths of these ties, as well as the density, structural holes, centrality, and cross-disciplinary links. Results suggest that the network dynamics behind the generation of quality output contrasts dramatically with that of quantity. We find that the relational dimension of scientists matters for quality, but not for output, while cognitive dimensions have the opposite effect, helping output, while being indifferent toward impact. The structural dimension of the network is the only area where there is some degree of convergence between output quantity and quality; here, we find a prevalence for the role of brokerage over cohesion. It concludes by discussing implications for both network research and science policy. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1555 / 1567
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999 [J].
Adams, JD ;
Black, GC ;
Clemmons, JR ;
Stephan, PE .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :259-285
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models [J].
Allison, PD ;
Waterman, RP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2002, VOL 32, 2002, 32 :247-265
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Connections
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, UCINET IV: Network Analysis Software
[6]  
Reference Manual
[7]  
[Anonymous], 12172 NAT BUR EC RES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Sociol. Methodol., DOI DOI 10.2307/270732
[10]  
Arora A., 1998, WORKING PAPER