The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone

被引:520
作者
Preece, J [1 ]
Nonnecke, B
Andrews, D
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
online community; bulletin board; posters; lurkers; survey; textbox questions; open-ended text questions; behavior; attitudes; support;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Even in busy online communities, usually only a small fraction of members post messages. Why do so many people prefer not to contribute publicly? From an online survey that generated 1, 188 responses from posters and lurkers from 375 MSN bulletin board communities, 219 lurkers spoke out about their reasons for not posting. While lurkers did not participate publicly, they did seek answers to questions. However, lurkers' satisfaction with their community experience was lower than those who post. Data from 19 checkbox items and over 490 open-ended responses were analyzed. From this analysis, the main reasons why lurkers lurk were concerned with: not needing to post; needing to find out more about the group before participating; thinking that they were being helpful by not posting; not being able to make the software work (i.e., poor usability); and not liking the group dynamics or the community was a poor fit for them. Two key conclusions were drawn from this analysis. First, there are many reasons why people lurk in online discussion communities. Second, and most important, most lurkers are not selfish free-riders. From these findings, it is clear that there are many ways to improve online community experiences for both posters and lurkers. Some solutions require improved software and better tools, but moderation and better interaction support will produce dramatic improvements. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 223
页数:23
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ABRAS C, WHAT MAKES ONLINE CO
[2]  
ABRAS C, 2003, THESIS U BALTIMORE C
[3]   Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users [J].
Andrews, D ;
Nonnecke, B ;
Preece, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2003, 16 (02) :185-210
[4]  
[Anonymous], VIRTUAL REALITY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Interaction Design-Beyond Human-Computer Interaction
[6]  
[Anonymous], LURKING EMAIL BASED
[7]  
[Anonymous], J COMPUTER MEDIATED
[8]  
[Anonymous], ETHN STUD REAL VIRT
[9]   Pad++: A zoomable graphical sketchpad for exploring alternate interface physics [J].
Bederson, BB ;
Hollan, JD ;
Perlin, K ;
Meyer, J ;
Bacon, D ;
Furnas, G .
JOURNAL OF VISUAL LANGUAGES AND COMPUTING, 1996, 7 (01) :3-31
[10]  
DOURISH P, 2001, WHERE ACTION IS