A fuzzy closeness approach to fuzzy multi-attribute decision making

被引:58
作者
Li, D. -F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Naval Acad, Dept 5, Dalian 116018, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Inst Aeronaut Engn, Dept Sci, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] AF Engn Univ, Missile Inst, Dept Command Engn, Xian 713800, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
decision analysis; fuzzy closeness method; TOPSIS; linguistic variable; fuzzy set; TOPSIS; NUMBERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10700-007-9010-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to develop a newfuzzy closeness (FC) methodology for multi-attribute decision making (MADM) in fuzzy environments, which is an important research field in decision science and operations research. The TOPSIS method based on an aggregating function representing "closeness to the ideal solution" is one of the well-known MADM methods. However, while the highest ranked alternative by the TOPSIS method is the best in terms of its ranking index, this does not mean that it is always the closest to the ideal solution. Furthermore, the TOPSIS method presumes crisp data while fuzziness is inherent in decision data and decision making processes, so that fuzzy ratings using linguistic variables are better suited for assessing decision alternatives. In this paper, a new FC method for MADM under fuzzy environments is developed by introducing a multi-attribute ranking index based on the particular measure of closeness to the ideal solution, which is developed from the fuzzy weighted Minkowski distance used as an aggregating function in a compromise programming method. The FC method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum "group utility" for the "majority" and a minimum individual regret for the "opponent". A real example of a personnel selection problem is examined to demonstrate the implementation process of the method proposed in this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 254
页数:18
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Appl
[2]   Multiobjective linguistic optimization [J].
Carlsson, C ;
Fullér, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :5-10
[3]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[4]   An approximate approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on left and right dominance [J].
Chen, LH ;
Lu, HW .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2001, 41 (12) :1589-1602
[5]   A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method [J].
Cheng, CH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 95 (03) :307-317
[6]   AN INDEX FOR ORDERING FUZZY NUMBERS [J].
CHOOBINEH, F ;
LI, HS .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1993, 54 (03) :287-294
[7]   Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights [J].
Deng, H ;
Yeh, CH ;
Willis, RJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :963-973
[8]  
Hwang C.L., 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES, P225, DOI DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-100608-104510
[9]   TOPSIS FOR MODM [J].
LAI, YJ ;
LIU, TY ;
HWANG, CL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 76 (03) :486-500
[10]   An approach to fuzzy multiattribute decision making under uncertainty [J].
Li, DF .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2005, 169 (1-2) :97-112