Policy Positions of Bureaucrats at the Front Lines: Are They Susceptible to Strategic Communication?

被引:38
作者
Andersen, Simon Calmar [1 ]
Jakobsen, Morten [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Govt, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS; IMPLEMENTATION; DISCRETION; MANAGERS; REFORM;
D O I
10.1111/puar.12584
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
It is well established that bureaucrats' implementation of policies is influenced by their own policy positions, that is, their attitudes toward the given policies. However, what affects the policy positions of bureaucrats? This article focuses on whether the policy positions of bureaucrats at the front lines of government are susceptible to frames and cues embedded in communication. Based on the notion that bureaucrats often adhere to certain professional norms when developing their attitudes toward policies, the authors hypothesize that communication frames and cues that align policies with such norms move bureaucrats' policy positions in favor of the policy. Results of four studies in European and American settings among mid- and street-level bureaucrats show support for the hypothesized effect. They also show that aligning policies with dimensions outside professional norms is ineffective, possibly even producing opposite effects.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / U188
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, VPaperback, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[2]  
Ajzen I., 2000, European Review of Social Psychology, V11, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14792779943000116, 10.1080/14792779943000116]
[3]   Policy Implications of Limiting Immigrant Concentration in Danish Public Schools [J].
Andersen, Simon Calmar ;
Thomsen, Mette Kjaergaard .
SCANDINAVIAN POLITICAL STUDIES, 2011, 34 (01) :27-52
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision/Making Processes in Administrative organizations
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion, DOI DOI 10.1177/009365097024005002
[6]   Teacher sorting, teacher quality, and student composition [J].
Bonesronning, H ;
Falch, T ;
Strom, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 49 (02) :457-483
[7]  
Brehm J.O., 1997, Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public
[8]   Framing theory [J].
Chong, Dennis ;
Druckman, James N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 :103-126
[9]  
Darling-Hammond L., 1990, SCH COLLABORATIVE CU, P25
[10]   The unbureaucratic personality [J].
DeHart-Davis, Leisha .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (05) :892-903