产业链纵向交易的契约治理与关系治理的实证研究

被引:15
作者
袁静 [1 ]
毛蕴诗 [2 ]
机构
[1] 广东外语外贸大学国际工商管理学院
[2] 中山大学管理学院
关键词
纵向交易; 契约治理; 关系治理; 交易绩效;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F274 [企业供销管理]; F224 [经济数学方法];
学科分类号
1201 ; 0701 ; 070104 ;
摘要
本研究旨在探讨产业链上纵向交易治理机制的类型,从供应商的角度分析中国制造业纵向交易中不同交易治理机制的绩效差异。将纵向交易的治理模式分为强契约型、强关系型、契约关系并重型和契约关系俱弱型四种类型。对107家制造业供应商的问卷调查结果发现,交易契约条款越明确,供应商响应客户的灵活性和交易产出绩效越差;供应商越早介入客户的新产品开发过程,其能够获得越好的交易产出绩效。在四种治理机制类型中,采用契约关系并重型治理模式的供应商比采用其他三种治理模式的供应商能更好地响应客户需求及其变动,投入成本比采用契约关系俱弱型治理机制的供应商更低,但投资回报率、利润率等交易产出绩效却比采用强关系型治理模式的供应商更差。
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
契约的演进与制度变迁[M]. 经济科学出版社 , 陈国富著, 2002
[2]  
比较制度分析[M]. 上海远东出版社 , (日)青木昌彦著, 2001
[3]  
Managing Supply Risk with Early Supplier Involvement: A Case Study and Research Propositions[J] . George A.Zsidisin,Michael E.Smith.Journal of Supply Chain Management . 2005 (4)
[4]  
Contractual Governance, Relational Governance, and the Performance of Interfirm Service Exchanges: The Influence of Boundary-Spanner Closeness:[J] . Ronald J. Ferguson,Michèle Paulin,Jasmin Bergeron.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science . 2005 (2)
[5]  
The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships?[J] . Danny Pimentel Claro,Geoffrey Hagelaar,Onno Omta.Industrial Marketing Management . 2003 (8)
[6]   The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships [J].
Antia, KD ;
Frazier, GL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (04) :67-81
[7]  
Measuring supply chain performance[J] . Benita M. Beamon.International Journal of Operations & Production Management . 1999 (3)
[8]   Incomplete contracts and strategic ambiguity [J].
Bernheim, BD ;
Whinston, MD .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 88 (04) :902-932
[9]   How relational norms affect compliance in industrial buying [J].
Joshi, AW ;
Arnold, SJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (02) :105-114
[10]  
Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States[J] . Mari Sako,Susan Helper.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization . 1998 (3)