品牌拉伸效应:标识形状对产品时间属性评估和品牌评价的影响

被引:32
作者
钟科
王海忠
机构
[1] 中山大学管理学院
关键词
品牌标识; 形状; 长宽比; 拉伸效应; 时间属性; 品牌评价;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F274 [企业供销管理];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
本文提出的"品牌拉伸效应"是指,长条形的品牌标识形状(相对于正方形)会使消费者认为产品能够使用的时间更长,即品牌标识形状的长宽比能够拉长消费者对产品时间属性(如电池的使用时间)的评估。文章在四个实验中发现,看到长条形标识的消费者认为空气清新剂的香氛持续时间更长、电动自行车的续航及充电时间更久、葡萄酒或葡萄汁的品牌历史更远、视频网站的平均视频时长更长;而收益时间和成本时间的不同起到了调节作用:长条形标识对收益时间的评价有利,而正方形标识则有助于获得好的成本时间评价;时间属性评估中介了标识形状对品牌评价的影响,但这一中介作用受到产品品类的调节,只有在时间属性重要的品类中,标识形状才会经由时间属性评估影响品牌评价。本文对企业进行品牌标识设计和多形状品牌标识管理具有借鉴价值。
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 76
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Exploring the Impact of Various Shaped Seating Arrangements on Persuasion [J].
Zhu, Rui ;
Argo, Jennifer J. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2013, 40 (02) :336-349
[2]   Judging Product Effectiveness from Perceived Spatial Proximity [J].
Chae, Boyoun ;
Li, Xiuping ;
Zhu, Rui .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2013, 40 (02) :317-335
[3]  
Graph‐Framing Effects in Decision Making[J] . Yan Sun,Shu Li,Nicolao Bonini,Yin Su.J. Behav. Dec. Making . 2011 (5)
[4]  
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis[J] . Journal of Consumer Research . 2010 (2)
[5]  
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions[J] . Kristopher J. Preacher,Derek D. Rucker,Andrew F. Hayes.Multivariate Behavioral Research . 2007 (1)
[6]  
Time in the mind: Using space to think about time[J] . Daniel Casasanto,Lera Boroditsky.Cognition . 2007 (2)
[7]  
Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities[J] . Kevin Lane Keller,Donald R. Lehmann.Marketing Science . 2006 (6)
[8]  
Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice[J] . Christine Moorman,Kristin Diehl,David Brinberg,Blair Kidwell.Journal of Consumer Research . 2004 (3)
[9]  
A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity[J] . Vincent Walsh.Trends in Cognitive Sciences . 2003 (11)
[10]  
Building strong brands in Asia: selecting the visual components of image to maximize brand strength[J] . Pamela W Henderson,Joseph A Cote,Siew Meng Leong,Bernd Schmitt.International Journal of Research in Marketing . 2003 (4)