北京市居民家庭日常出行碳排放的量化分布与影响因素

被引:36
作者
肖作鹏 [1 ]
柴彦威 [1 ]
刘志林 [2 ]
机构
[1] 北京大学城市与环境学院
[2] 清华大学公共管理学院
关键词
居民家庭; 碳排放; 量化分布; Logistics模型; 北京市;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X21 [环境与环境系统];
学科分类号
083001 ;
摘要
本文采用2007年北京市居民活动日志调查数据,对北京市居民家庭工作日出行碳排放进行了测算,采用分等定级和洛伦兹曲线模拟的方法,分析家庭日常出行碳排放的个体间、社区内和社区间分异。研究表明,个体间差异总体比较符合60/20分布法则,社区内的碳排放差异指数较大,内城单位社区和胡同社区家庭普遍低碳出行。
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 112
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   居住空间对家庭购物出行决策的影响 [J].
张文佳 ;
柴彦威 .
地理科学进展, 2009, 28 (03) :362-369
[2]   Who produces the most CO2 emissions for trips in the Seoul metropolis area? [J].
Ko, Joonho ;
Park, Dongjoo ;
Lim, Hyeonsup ;
Hwang, In Chang .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 16 (05) :358-364
[3]   Measuring the potential implications of introducing a cap and share scheme in Ireland to reduce green house gas emissions [J].
McNamara, David ;
Caulfield, Brian .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (04) :579-586
[4]  
Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins?[J] . Zia Wadud.Transportation Research Part A . 2010 (10)
[5]   Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax [J].
Bristow, Abigail L. ;
Wardman, Mark ;
Zanni, Alberto M. ;
Chintakayala, Phani K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) :1824-1837
[6]   Can EV (electric vehicles) address Ireland's CO2 emissions from transport? [J].
Smith, William J. .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) :4514-4521
[7]   A comparative evaluation of large-scale personal travel planning projects in England [J].
Chatterjee, Kiron .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2009, 16 (06) :293-305
[8]  
Impact of cap-and-trade policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions on U.S. households[J] . Md Rumi Shammin,Clark W. Bullard.Ecological Economics . 2009 (8)
[9]  
Disentangling the influence of neighborhood type and self-selection on driving behavior: an application of sample selection model[J] . Xinyu (Jason) Cao.Transportation . 2009 (2)
[10]   Equity analysis of personal tradable carbon permits for the road transport sector [J].
Wadud, Zia ;
Noland, Robert B. ;
Graham, Daniel J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (06) :533-544