社会资本对产学研合作创新绩效的影响机理——基于指定搜索方法和结构方程的实证

被引：4

作者：

刘国巍

机构：

[1] 桂林航天工业学院

来源：

技术经济与管理研究 | 2015年 / 07期

关键词：

产学研; 社会资本; 创新绩效; 协同创新;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G311 [组织和管理];

学科分类号：

1201 ; 1204 ;

摘要：

针对社会资本如何影响产学研合作创新的问题,文章基于创新绩效视角,首先构建了社会资本结构维、关系维和认知维对产学研合作创新绩效影响的理论框架;然后,选择我国132家企业、大学和研究机构为研究对象,利用指定搜索方法确定结构维、关系维和认知维之间的最佳互动关系,并对所提假设运用结构方程模型进行验证和模型修正。修正模型的结果表明:社会资本对产学研合作创新绩效产生(0.69)直接正向影响;节点度对产学研合作创新绩效提升的影响不明显;社会资本各维度及其测度指标对产学研合作创新绩效产生小于0.5的间接正向影响;结构维对关系维与产学研合作创新绩效的影响路径起中介作用。

引用

页码：28 / 33

页数：6

共 10 条

[1]

The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Levin, Daniel Z.,Cross, Rob. Management Science . 2004

[2]

Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories[J] . Chao-Min Chiu,Meng-Hsiang Hsu,Eric T.G. Wang. &nbspDecision Support Systems . 2006 (3)

[3]

Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Ahuja, Manju K.,Galletta, Dennis F.,Carley, Kathleen M. Management Science . 2003

[4]

Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Ray Reagans,Bill McEvily. Administrative Science Quarterly . 2003

[5] Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? [J].

Landry, R ;

Amara, N ;

Lamari, M .

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2002, 69 (07) :681-701

[6]

Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view[J] . Balaji R.Koka,John E.Prescott. &nbspStrat. Mgmt. J. . 2002 (9)

[7]

Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective[J] . Zeki Simsek. &nbspJournal of Management . 2003 (3)

[8]

Network Updating and Exploratory Learning Environment*[J] . MooweonRhee. &nbspJournal of Management Studies . 2004 (6)

[9]

Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance[J] . AkbarZaheer,Geoffrey G.Bell. &nbspStrat. Mgmt. J. . 2005 (9)

[10]

Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. Victor Gilsing,Bart Nooteboom. European Management Review . 2005

← 1 →