企业智力资本对渐进式和根本性技术创新影响的路径探究

被引:22
作者
林筠
何婕
机构
[1] 西安理工大学工商管理学院
关键词
智力资本; 隐性知识转移; 渐进式技术创新; 根本性技术创新;
D O I
10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2011.01.013
中图分类号
F272 [企业计划与经营决策];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
通过文献研究与企业调研访谈探究企业智力资本与技术创新之间的路径关系.研究表明:企业智力资本对渐进式和根本性技术创新均具有显著正效应,组织资本通过内部隐性知识转移对渐进式技术创新产生影响;内部隐性知识转移受组织资本和关系资本影响显著,且组织资本的作用更强,外部隐性知识转移受人力资本和关系资本影响显著;而内部隐性知识转移仅对渐进式技术创新具有显著正效应,外部隐性知识转移对根本性技术创新具有显著正效应,同时,外部隐性知识转移受内部隐性知识转移的影响显著.研究结论为企业实施有效的智力资本积累和技术创新战略提供借鉴.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 98
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   我国软件企业智力资本价值创造潜力的评估 [J].
原毅军 ;
孙晓华 ;
柏丹 .
中国工业经济, 2005, (03) :44-50
[2]   突破性创新:概念界定与比较 [J].
付玉秀 ;
张洪石 .
数量经济技术经济研究, 2004, (03) :73-83
[3]  
An empirical multi-level analysis for achieving balance between incremental and radical innovations[J] . C. Annique Un.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management . 2010 (1)
[4]  
Knowledge acquisition and the foreign development of high-tech start-ups: A social capital approach[J] . Manuela Presutti,Cristina Boari,Luciano Fratocchi.International Business Review . 2007 (1)
[5]   The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities [J].
Subramaniam, M ;
Youndt, MA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 48 (03) :450-463
[6]  
Reconfiguring knowledge management - combining intellectual capital, intangible assets and knowledge creation[J] . Tomi Hussi.Journal of Knowledge Management . 2004 (2)
[7]  
Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns*[J] . Mark A.Youndt,MohanSubramaniam,Scott A.Snell.Journal of Management Studies . 2004 (2)
[8]   The influence of knowledge accumulation on buyer-supplier codevelopment projects [J].
Appleyard, MM .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2003, 20 (05) :356-373
[9]  
An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation[J] . Christine S Koberg,Dawn R Detienne,Kurt A Heppard.Journal of High Technology Management Research . 2003 (1)
[10]   The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation [J].
Hill, CWL ;
Rothaermel, FT .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :257-274