WTO体制下法庭之友意见书制度评析

被引:3
作者
王燕
机构
[1] 广东外语外贸大学国际商务英语学院
关键词
世界贸易组织; 法庭之友; 争端解决程序;
D O I
10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2010.03.001
中图分类号
D996.1 [国际商法(国际贸易法)];
学科分类号
030109 ; 030206 ; 030609 ;
摘要
上诉机构通过解释信息获取权授予法庭之友在争端解决程序中主动提交意见书的权利,表面上看似给予法庭之友司法参与WTO的权利,但从其实际效果来看,法庭之友主动提交的意见书甚少为争端解决机构所考虑,并因上诉机构制定的相关程序要求,丧失独立性,沦为争端方的说客。
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 58
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Panel Report on US-Steel Report. WT/DS138/R and Appellate Body Report .
[2]  
David Livshiz."Public Participation In Disputes Under Regional Trade Agreements: How Much Is Too Much--The Case For A Limited Right Of Intervention". N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L . 2005
[3]  
David Livshiz."Public Participation In Disputes Under Regional Trade Agreements: How Much Is Too Much--The Case For A Limited Right Of Intervention". N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L . 2005
[4]  
General Council.General Council Minutes of Meeting. WT/GC/MM60 . 2001
[5]  
United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products,Report of the Appellate Body. WT/DS58/AB/R .
[6]  
Jeffrey L. Dunoff."The WTO‘s Legitimacy Crisis: Reflections on the Law and Politics of WTO Dispute Resolution". The American Review of International Arbitration . 2002
[7]  
Robert Howse.The Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization. The legitimacy of International Institutions . 2001
[8]  
Jacqueline Peel.Giving the Public a Voice in the Protection of the Global Environment:Avenues for articipation by NGOs in Dispute Resolution at the European Court of Justice and World Trade Organization. Winter . 2001
[9]  
James Cameron,Jacob Werksman.“Supplementary Amicus Brief Submitted by WFN/FIELD”. http://www.field.org.uk/papers/pdf/asbestosamicus.pdf . 2001
[10]  
Bryan A Garner.Black’s Law Dictionary. . 1999