垂直专业化与危机中的贸易下滑

被引:21
作者
倪红福 [1 ]
夏杰长 [2 ]
机构
[1] 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院服务经济研究室
[2] 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院
关键词
中间产品贸易; 垂直专业化; 全球投入产出模型; 增加值贸易;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F746 [世界进出口贸易概况];
学科分类号
020206 ; 1202 ; 020202 ;
摘要
本文通过全球投入产出模型研究发现:若全球生产网络体系正常运转,垂直关联并没有放大外生最终需求冲击对全球贸易下滑的影响,反而在一定程度上缓解了全球贸易下滑。中间产品贸易的下降幅度远低于最终需求产品贸易,但因权重为2/3,其贡献率较大(49%以上);非垂直专业化值与垂直专业化值的下降幅度基本一致,因后者权重较小,其对全球贸易的贡献率低于28%。进一步比较真实统计数据计算结果表明:一旦供给侧遭到外生冲击,全球生产网络体系遭到破坏,垂直关联中断,将导致中间产品贸易和垂直专业化贸易大幅下降,进而造成全球贸易大幅下滑。
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 119
页数:25
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production[J] . Marcel P. Timmer,Erik Dietzenbacher,Bart Los,Robert Stehrer,Gaaitzen J. Vries.Review of International Economics . 2015 (3)
[2]   Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports [J].
Koopman, Robert ;
Wang, Zhi ;
Wei, Shang-Jin .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (02) :459-494
[3]  
Off the cliff and back? Credit conditions and international trade during the global financial crisis[J] . Davin Chor,Kalina Manova.Journal of International Economics . 2011 (1)
[4]  
Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added[J] . Robert C. Johnson,Guillermo Noguera.Journal of International Economics . 2011 (2)
[5]   Vertical Linkages and the Collapse of Global Trade [J].
Bems, Rudolfs ;
Johnson, Robert C. ;
Yi, Kei-Mu .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (03) :308-312
[6]  
Inventories, Lumpy Trade, and Large Devaluations[J] . George Alessandria,Joseph P. Kaboski,Virgiliu Midrigan.The American Economic Review . 2010 (5)
[7]  
Collapse in World Trade[J] . Anonymous.The International Economy . 2009 (2)
[8]  
DEFLATION OF INPUT‐OUTPUT TABLES FROM THE USER'S POINT OF VIEW: A HEURISTIC APPROACH[J] . ErikDietzenbacher,Alex R.Hoen.Review of Income and Wealth . 2005 (1)
[9]   Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? [J].
Yi, KM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (01) :52-102
[10]   The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade [J].
Hummels, D ;
Ishii, J ;
Yi, KM .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 54 (01) :75-96