从威慑到最优执法理论:经济学的视角

被引:21
作者
杨晓维 [1 ]
张云辉 [2 ]
机构
[1] 北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院
[2] 哈尔滨理工大学经济学院
关键词
威慑执法; 最优执法; 执法成本;
D O I
10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2010.12.018
中图分类号
F0 [经济学];
学科分类号
0201 ;
摘要
早期的执法经济理论,关注如何通过惩罚违法者威慑潜在违法行为。然而,考虑到执法本身的成本,特别是当法律本身非优化时违法行为带来的外部收益(或执法的成本),简单地威慑执法带来的成本可能大于收益。因此,以社会福利最大化为执法目标的最优执法理论认为,并非对所有违法行为都要实施威慑,只有当执法收益在边际上大于执法成本时,惩罚违法者才是有效率的。基于相关文献,本文试图梳理和介绍执法经济理论的基本发展脉络和思想。
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Cost‐Benefit Analysis: Definition, Justification, and Comment on Conference Papers[J] . Richard A. Posner.The Journal of Legal Studies . 2000 (S2)
[2]   The economic theory of public enforcement of law [J].
Polinsky, AM ;
Shavell, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2000, 38 (01) :45-76
[3]  
Private Enforcement of Public Laws: A Theory of Legal Reform[J] . Jonathan R. Hay,Andrei Shleifer.The American Economic Review . 1998 (2)
[4]   MARGINAL DETERRENCE IN ENFORCEMENT OF LAW [J].
MOOKHERJEE, D ;
PNG, IPL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (05) :1039-1066
[5]   ENFORCEMENT COSTS AND THE OPTIMAL MAGNITUDE AND PROBABILITY OF FINES [J].
POLINSKY, AM ;
SHAVELL, S .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1992, 35 (01) :133-148
[6]   PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT OF FINES [J].
POLINSKY, AM .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1980, 9 (01) :105-127
[7]  
An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking[J] . Isaac Ehrlich,Richard A. Posner.The Journal of Legal Studies . 1974 (1)
[8]  
Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers[J] . Gary S. Becker,George J. Stigler.The Journal of Legal Studies . 1974 (1)
[9]  
The Deterrent Effect of Criminal Law Enforcement[J] . Isaac Ehrlich.The Journal of Legal Studies . 1972 (2)
[10]  
The Optimum Enforcement of Laws[J] . George J. Stigler.Journal of Political Economy . 1970 (3)