MAU程序和自由讨论的群体决策质量比较

被引：7

作者：

朱华燕 ^{[1
,2
]}

郑全全 ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] 浙江大学心理学系

[2] 杭州电子工学院

来源：

心理学报 | 2001年 / 06期

基金：

浙江省自然科学基金;

关键词：

MAU决策程序; 自由讨论; 信息不分享; 群体决策质量;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

C934 [决策学];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

采用实验室研究方法 ,比较了在信息不分享条件下多特征效用模型 (MAU)决策程序和自由讨论对群体决策质量的影响 ,并对影响MAU决策质量的主要因素进行了初步探讨。结果发现 :(1)MAU程序可以较好地克服群体动力学方面的一些消极影响 ,表现出挖掘信息 (尤其是非分享信息 )的充分性。但MAU程序在被试的态度和社会交互作用等心理效标上并未显示出优势 ;(2 )在MAU条件下 ,群体规模的增大对分享和非分享信息的讨论量无显著影响。而任务难度效应要和群体规模一起才能起到作用

引用

页码：552 / 557

页数：6

共 10 条

[1]

Stewart D & Stasser.Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision-making. Journal of Personality . 1995

[2]

Stasser G,Stewart D.Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality . 1992

[3]

Stasser G,Titus W.Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group decision. Journal of Personality . 1987

[4]

Timmermans D,Vlek C.An evaluation study of the effectiveness of multi-attribute support as a function of problem complexity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 1994

[5]

Timmermans D,Vlek C.Effects on the decision quality of supporting multi-attribute evaluation in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 1996

[6]

Stasser G,Titus W.Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Journal of Personality . 1985

[7]

Davis JH.Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social schemes. Psychological Review . 1973

[8]

Stasser G,Taylor LA,Hanna C.Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three-and six-person groups. Journal of Personality . 1989

[9]

Benbasat L,Lim LH.The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research . 1993

[10]

Lam SS,Schaubroeck J.Improving group decisions by better pooling information: a comparative advantage of group decision support systems. Journal of Applied Psychology . 2000

← 1 →