线性供应函数重复竞标时发电商学习对市场均衡的影响

被引：11

作者：

刘有飞

倪以信

机构：

[1] 香港大学电机电子工程系,香港大学电机电子工程系香港,香港

来源：

电力系统自动化 | 2004年 / 17期

关键词：

电力市场; 现货市场; 策略性投标; 线性供应函数; 市场均衡; 博弈论;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F407.6 [电气、电子工业];

学科分类号：

020205 ; 0202 ;

摘要：

研究了电力市场中线性供应函数重复竞标时发电商学习对市场均衡的影响。为此,文中首先建立了发电商最优竞标的数学模型,并对市场均衡点进行了求解。然后说明了发电商有意愿学习,并证明了在一定条件下所有发电商都学习会导致市场均衡点价格下降,使用户受益,也使某些厂商利润下降;而在另一些条件下,则恰恰相反。但发电商全面学习所达到的均衡点价格反映了真实的市场供需关系,反映了市场作为“看不见的手”的调控作用。数字仿真结果表明了文中分析和结论的正确性。

引用

页码：16 / 21

页数：6

共 15 条

[1]

Comprehensive Bidding Strategies with Genetic Programming/Finite State Automata. Richter Jr C W,Shebl G B,Ashlock D. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems . 1999

[2]

Understanding How Market Power Can Arise in Network Competition: A Game Theoretic Approach. Berry C A,Hobbs B F,Meroney R P,et al. Utilities Policy . 1999

[3]

Optimal Bidding Strategies and Modeling of Imperfect Information Among Competitive Generators. Wen F,David A K. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems . 2001

[4]

A Continuous Strategy Game for Power Transactions Analysis in Competitive Electricity Markets. Park J B,Kim B H,Jung M H,et al. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems . 2001

[5]

Application of Games with Incomplete Information for Pricing Electricity in Deregulated Power Pools. Ferrero R W,Rivera J F,Shahidehpour S M. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems . 1998

[6]

Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Green R J,Newbery D M. Journal of Politics . 1992

[7]

Optimization Based Bidding Strategies in the Deregulated Market. Zhang D,Wang Y,Luh P B. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems . 2000

[8]

Competitive Bidding in Electricity Supply. David A K. IEEProceedings--Circuits, Devices & Systems . 1993

[9]

Nash Equilibrium Bidding Strategies in a Bilateral Electricity Market. Song H,Liu C C,Lawarree J. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems . 2002

[10]

Increasing Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Green R J. The Journal of Industrial Economics . 1996

← 1 2 →