学生阅读素养的提升路径:新教育实验学校的实践——基于阅读态度、阅读行为与阅读素养关系的比较研究

被引：2

作者：

夏之晨 ^{[1
]}

朱永新 ^{[2
,1
]}

许庆豫 ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] 苏州大学教育学院

[2] 中国民主促进会中央委员会

来源：

教育研究与评论 | 2017年 / 02期

关键词：

新教育实验; 阅读素养; 阅读态度; 阅读行为;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G623.23 [阅读];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0401 ;

摘要：

研究以1402名新教育实验学校四年级学生为被试,运用阅读态度问卷、阅读行为问卷和阅读素养测试试卷进行测量研究,考察新教育实验学校学生的阅读态度、阅读行为和阅读素养之间的关系。结果发现:新教育实验学校学生的阅读态度和阅读行为均处于较高水平;阅读态度和阅读行为对阅读素养的联合解释力为11.9%;在阅读态度的子维度中,阅读自信相比阅读兴趣和阅读动机对学生阅读素养的预测效力更大;阅读行为在阅读态度和阅读素养之间起到完全中介的作用。

引用

页码：29 / 37

页数：9

共 33 条

[1]

PIRLS 2011Framework. IEA. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/downloads/PIRLS2011_Framework.pdf . 2017

[2]

Poor readersattitudes:Effects of using interests and trade books in an integrated language arts approach. Reeves C K. Reading Research&Instruction . 1994

[3]

Relating Reading Attitude to Reading Achievement in an East Los Angeles Junior High School. Russ K M I. Reading Improvement . 1988

[4]

Dimensions of children’’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Baker L,,Wigfield A. Reading Research Quarterly . 1999

[5]

Development of young children’s reading selfconcepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. JW Chapman,WE Tunmer. Journal of Education . 1995

[6]

Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Cunningham A E,Stanovich K E. Developmental Psychobiology . 1997

[7]

Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation. Schunk D H. Educational Psychologist . 1991

[8]

Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount[J] . John T. Guthrie,Allan Wigfield,Jamie L. Metsala,Kathleen E. Cox. &nbspScientific Studies of Reading . 1999 (3)

[9]

Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research[J] . Gregory Schraw,Stephen Lehman. &nbspEducational Psychology Review . 2001 (1)

[10] Motivational and cognitive contributions to students' amount of reading [J].

Cox, KE ;

Guthrie, JT .

CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 26 (01) :116-131

← 1 2 3 4 →