美国、日本和加拿大农业保险项目比较分析

被引:18
作者
张玉环
机构
[1] 中国社会科学院农村发展研究所
关键词
农业保险; 政府成本; 经营成本; 补贴效率;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F841.36 [];
学科分类号
120404 ; 020204 ;
摘要
本文简要回顾了美国、日本和加拿大的政府农业保险项目的历史和现状,介绍了三国的政府农业保险项目经营制度以及三国政府为提高承保率所采取的措施,简略比较分析了三国政府农业保险项目的经营成本、政府成本和农户补贴效率。本文的基本结论是:这三个国家根据情况和需要选择了各自独特的农业保险经营制度,为了提高承保率而采取了一些相同的措施;但是,美国政府的措施更繁杂,也因此招致了更大的经营成本和政府成本。表面看来,美国政府的农业保险项目最成功,但实际上其补贴农民的效率明显低于加拿大。
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 90
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Experience with Crop Insurance Programs in the United States. Gardener,B,R Kramer. Crop Insurance for Agricultural Development . 1986
[2]  
Evolution of Crop Insurance Program in Japan. Yamauchi Toyoji. Crop Insurance for Agricultural Development, Issues and Experience . 1986
[3]  
Government Support to Agricultural Insurance:Challenges and Options for Developing Countries〔DB/OL〕. Mahul,Oliver,Stutley,Charles J. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/financial sector/Resources/Agricultural Insurance_Overview.pdf . 2010
[4]  
An Aggregate Analysis of Canadian Crop Insurance Policy. Sigurdson,D,Sin,R. Economics of Agricultural Crop Insurance:Theory and Evidence . 1994
[5]  
Federal Crop Insurance:Background. Shields,D.A. CRS R40532 . 2015
[6]  
"Federal Crop Insurance 1938-1982.". Kramer,R. A. Agricultural History . 1983
[7]  
Premium Payments:Why Crop Insurance Costs too Much?. Smith,V. H. American Boondoggle-Fixing the 2012 Farm Bill . 2011
[8]  
The Risk Management Safety Net:Portfolio Analysis-Market Penetration and Potential. Risk Management Agency. http://www.rma.usda.gov/pubs/2013/portfolio . 2013
[9]  
Canada’’s Agricultural Business Risk Management Programs. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. the International Conference-Crisis and Risk Management in the Agricultural Sector . 2010
[10]  
The 2014 farm bill (P.L.113-79):Summary and side-by-side. Chite R M. CRS report No.R43076 . 2014