Systemic risk and structural changes in a bipartite bank network: A new perspective on the Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s

被引:6
作者
Sakamoto Y. [1 ]
Vodenska I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto
[2] Administrative Sciences Department, Metropolitan College, Boston University, Boston, 02215, MA
关键词
Bipartite network; Cascading failure model; Japanese banking crisis; Risk propagation;
D O I
10.1093/comnet/cnw018
中图分类号
TP33 [电子数字计算机(不连续作用电子计算机)];
学科分类号
081201 ;
摘要
The Japanese banking crisis in the late 1990s has been considered a significant turning point in the history of Japanese banking system. This period has attracted researcher's interest to study the increase of bad debt on Japanese banks' balance sheets leading to the crisis of the 1990s. Here, we investigate the risk propagating through a bipartite banking network consisting of two kinds of nodes: assets on one hand and banks on the other. Using a Cascading Failure Model (CFM) to describe the propagation of failures in the network, we attempt to understand the main culprit provoking the crisis and the systemic conditions that amplified or repressed the 'chain reaction' of bankruptcies. Based on simulations using the CFM, we find that the asset 'Loans on Bills' was not only the main culprit for the Japanese banking crisis of 1990s but also a critical separator for banks' survival. Furthermore, by using CFM, an abrupt change of the number of bankruptcies appears with just a small change of bank liquidity. This finding indicates a high level of fragility in the banking system, highlighting the importance to consider not only individual banks' asset portfolios but also the connections between banks to guard financial institutions against cascading failures. © The authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 333
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Caccioli F., Shrestha M., Moore C., Farmer J.D., Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios, J. Banking Financ., 46, pp. 233-245, (2014)
[2]  
Castellacci G., Choib Y., Modeling contagion in the Eurozone crisis via dynamical systems, J. Banking Financ., 50, pp. 400-410, (2015)
[3]  
Georg C.-P., The effect of the interbank network structure on contagion and common shocks, J. Banking Financ., 37, pp. 2216-2228, (2013)
[4]  
Ladley D., Contagion and risk-sharing on the inter-bank market, J. Banking Financ., 37, pp. 1384-1400, (2013)
[5]  
Burkholz R., Garas A., Schweitzer F., How damage diversification can reduce systemic risk, pp. 1-11, (2015)
[6]  
Burkholz R., Leduc M.V., Garas A., Schweitzer F., Systemic risk in multiplex networks with asymmetric coupling and threshold feedback, pp. 1-18, (2015)
[7]  
Tasca P., Mavrodiev P., Schweitzer F., Quantifying the impact of leveraging and diversification on systemic risk, J. Financ. Stability, 15, pp. 43-52, (2014)
[8]  
Barabasi A.L., Oltvai A.N., Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization, Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, pp. 101-113, (2004)
[9]  
Farahani R.Z., Miandoabchi E., Szeto W.Y., Rashidi H., A review of urban transportation network design problems, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 229, pp. 281-302, (2013)
[10]  
Doerr B., Fouz M., Friedrich T., Why rumors spread so quickly in social networks, Commun. ACM., 55, pp. 70-75, (2012)