THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE CORPORATION - CONCEPTS, EVIDENCE, AND IMPLICATIONS

被引:5505
作者
DONALDSON, T
PRESTON, LE
机构
[1] UNIV MARYLAND, COLL BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, COLLEGE PK, MD 20742 USA
[2] KENNEDY INSET ETH, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The stakeholder theory has been advanced and justified in the management literature on the basis of its descriptive accuracy, instrumental power, and normative validity. These three aspects of the theory, although interrelated, are quite distinct; they involve different types of evidence and argument and have different implications. In this article, we examine these three aspects of the theory and critique and integrate important contributions to the literature related to each. We conclude that the three aspects of stakeholder theory are mutually supportive and that the normative base of the theory-which includes the modern theory of property rights-is fundamental.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 91
页数:27
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
ALKHAFAJI AF, 1989, SETAKEHOLDER APPROAC
[2]  
American Law Institute, 1992, PRINC CORP GOV AN RE
[3]  
ANDERSON JW, 1989, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES
[4]  
Aoki M., 1984, COOPERATIVE GAME THE
[5]   AN EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY AND PROFITABILITY [J].
AUPPERLE, KE ;
CARROLL, AB ;
HATFIELD, JD .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1985, 28 (02) :446-463
[6]   AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY PREDICTIONS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE [J].
BARTON, SL ;
HILL, NC ;
SUNDARAM, S .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1989, 18 (01) :36-44
[7]  
Baumhart R., 1968, HONEST PROFIT WHAT B
[8]   PLACES FOR PLURALISM [J].
BECKER, LC .
ETHICS, 1992, 102 (04) :707-719
[9]  
BECKER LC, 1992, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V21, P196
[10]  
BECKER LC, 1992, ENCY ETHICS, V2, P1023