IDENTIFYING COMMON METHODS VARIANCE WITH DATA COLLECTED FROM A SINGLE SOURCE - AN UNRESOLVED STICKY ISSUE

被引：345

作者：

AVOLIO, BJ ^{[1
]}

YAMMARINO, FJ ^{[1
]}

BASS, BM ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] SUNY BINGHAMTON,SCH MANAGEMENT,BINGHAMTON,NY 13901

来源：

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT | 1991年 / 17卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/014920639101700303

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Common methods variance that can result when two or more constructs are measured by a single rater or source was examined using Within and Between Analysis (WABA). Levels of analysis effects were assessed for single-source leadership and outcome ratings obtained using surveys completed by the followers of managers employed by a multidivisional Fortune 500 high technology organization. The alignment of singleand multiple-source effects with the analytic procedures, a critique of recommended procedures for addressing problems with single-source variance, an alternative conceptual framework, and strategies to address problems with research involving questionnaire! survey self-report measures are discussed. © 1991, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：571 / 587

页数：17

共 34 条

[1]

Avolio BruceJ., 1988, EMERGING LEADERSHIP, P29

[2]

Bass B. M., 1990, MULTIFACTOR LEADERSH

[3] POTENTIAL BIASES IN LEADERSHIP MEASURES - HOW PROTOTYPES, LENIENCY, AND GENERAL SATISFACTION RELATE TO RATINGS AND RANKINGS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL AND TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP CONSTRUCTS [J].