UTILITY OF THE ASSESSMENT-CENTER AS A SELECTION DEVICE

被引:57
作者
CASCIO, WF
SILBEY, V
机构
[1] Florida International U, School of Business and Organizational Sciences, Miami
关键词
utility of assessment center as personnel selection device;
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.107
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Evaluated the utility of the assessment center by means of the Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser continuous variable utility model. After specifying several cost assumptions, 6 parameters were varied systematically: the validity and cost of the assessment center, the validity of the ordinary selection procedure, the selection ratio, the standard deviation of the criterion, and the number of assessment centers. The largest impacts on assessment center payoffs were exerted by the size of the criterion standard deviation, the selection ratio, and the difference in validity between the assessment center and the ordinary selection procedure. Even assessment centers with validities as low as .10 showed positive gains in utility over random selection. (39 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1979 American Psychological Association.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Bray D.W., 1974, FORMATIVE YEARS BUSI
[2]   THE MANAGEMENT PROGRESS STUDY [J].
BRAY, DW .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1964, 19 (06) :419-420
[3]   SELECTION OF SALESMEN BY MEANS OF AN ASSESSMENT CENTER [J].
BRAY, DW ;
CAMPBELL, RJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 52 (1P1) :36-&
[4]  
BRAY DW, 1966, PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGR, V80
[5]  
BROGDEN H E, 1946, J Educ Psychol, V37, P65, DOI 10.1037/h0061548
[6]  
Brogden HE, 1949, PERS PSYCHOL, V2, P171
[7]  
BYHAM WC, 1971, TRAIN DEV J, V25, P10
[8]  
BYHAM WC, 1970, HARVARD BUS REV, V48, P150
[9]  
BYHAM WC, 1970, STUD PERS PSYCHOL, V2, P21
[10]  
CAMPBELL JP, 1970, MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR