THE PERSISTENCE AND INEFFICIENCY OF PROPERTY-TAX FINANCE OF LOCAL PUBLIC-EXPENDITURES

被引:37
作者
KRELOVE, R
机构
[1] International Monetary Fund, Washington
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0047-2727(93)90074-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I both characterize and evaluate equilibrium outcomes in multiple-jurisdiction economies with proPerty and land taxation but where direct taxation of residents is not possible. The model contains perfectly mobile capital and population, and competitive, entrepreneurial governments that choose local taxes and expenditures to maximize after-tax land rent. When the cost of public goods is proportional to population the property tax emerges as the sole source of local finance, even though the land tax has no deadweight loss. It is shown that equilibria are not constrained efficient in general; hence decentralized decision-making is not consistent with the best use of the available tax instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 435
页数:21
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   AGGREGATE LAND RENTS, EXPENDITURE ON PUBLIC-GOODS, AND OPTIMAL CITY SIZE [J].
ARNOTT, RJ ;
STIGLITZ, JE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1979, 93 (04) :471-500
[2]   PIGOU, TAXATION AND PUBLIC GOODS [J].
ATKINSON, AB ;
STERN, NH .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1974, 41 (01) :119-128
[3]   A CRITIQUE OF TIEBOUT THEORY OF LOCAL PUBLIC-EXPENDITURES [J].
BEWLEY, TF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1981, 49 (03) :713-740
[4]   PROPERTY VALUE MAXIMIZATION AND PUBLIC-SECTOR EFFICIENCY [J].
BRUECKNER, JK .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1983, 14 (01) :1-15
[5]  
Diamond P.A., 1975, J PUBLIC ECON, V4, P335
[6]   THE IMPLICATIONS OF COMPETITION AMONG JURISDICTIONS - DOES TIEBOUT NEED POLITICS [J].
EPPLE, D ;
ZELENITZ, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1981, 89 (06) :1197-1217
[7]   ZONING AND PROPERTY TAXATION IN A SYSTEM OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS [J].
HAMILTON, BW .
URBAN STUDIES, 1975, 12 (02) :205-211
[8]  
HARBERGER AC, 1971, J ECON LIT, V9, P785
[9]   THE TIEBOUT MODEL - BRING BACK THE ENTREPRENEURS [J].
HENDERSON, JV .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1985, 93 (02) :248-264
[10]  
HOYT W, 1990, COMPETITIVE JURIDICT