CUSTOMIZED ANTENATAL GROWTH CHARTS

被引:621
作者
GARDOSI, J
CHANG, A
KALYAN, B
SAHOTA, D
SYMONDS, EM
机构
[1] Perinatal Research and Monitoring Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0140-6736(92)91342-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Charts for fetal growth do not take physiological variables into account. We have therefore designed a computer-generated antenatal chart that can be easily "customised" for each individual pregnancy, taking the mother's characteristics and birthweights from previous pregnancies into consideration. The adjusted birthweight range expected at 40 weeks' gestation is combined with a standard, longitudinal ultrasound-derived curve for intrauterine weight gain. Review at the Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK, of 4179 pregnancies with ultrasound-confirmed dates showed that, in addition to gestation and sex, maternal weight at first antenatal-clinic visit, height, ethnic group, and parity were significant determinants of birthweight in our population. Correction factors were calculated for each of these variables and entered into a computer program to adjust the normal birthweight centile limits. With adjusted centiles we found that 28% of babies conventionally designated small for gestational age (< 10th centile) and 22% of those designated large (> 90th centile) were in fact within normal limits for the pregnancy. Conversely, 24% and 26% of babies identified as small or large, respectively, with adjusted centiles were "missed" by conventional unadjusted centile assessment. Adjustment for physiological variables will make assessment of fetal growth more precise and reduce unnecessary investigations, interventions, and parental anxiety.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 287
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   ARE OUR BABIES BECOMING BIGGER [J].
ALBERMAN, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1991, 84 (05) :257-260
[2]   NOMOGRAMS FOR PRECISE DETERMINATION OF BIRTH-WEIGHT FOR DATES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
COLES, EC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (02) :81-86
[3]   STANDARD OF FETAL GROWTH FOR UNITED-STATES-OF-AMERICA [J].
BRENNER, WE ;
EDELMAN, DA ;
HENDRICKS, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 126 (05) :555-564
[4]   ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT [J].
CAMPBELL, S ;
WILKIN, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09) :689-697
[5]   BIRTH-WEIGHT BY GESTATIONAL-AGE AND ITS EFFECT ON PERINATAL-MORTALITY IN WHITE AND IN PUNJABI BIRTHS - EXPERIENCE AT A DISTRICT GENERAL-HOSPITAL IN WEST LONDON 1967-1975 [J].
DAWSON, I ;
JONAS, EG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1982, 89 (11) :896-899
[6]   FETAL HEAD AND ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCES .2. A CRITICAL RE-EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP TO MENSTRUAL AGE [J].
DETER, RL ;
HARRIST, RB ;
HADLOCK, FP ;
CARPENTER, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1982, 10 (08) :365-372
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUAL GROWTH STANDARDS FOR ESTIMATED FETAL WEIGHT .2. WEIGHT PREDICTION DURING THE 3RD TRIMESTER AND AT BIRTH [J].
DETER, RL ;
ROSSAVIK, IK ;
CARPENTER, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1989, 17 (02) :83-88
[8]  
EVANS T, 1990, CLIN APPLICATION ULT
[9]   BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDS IN A COMMUNITY OF MIXED RACIAL ORIGIN [J].
GRUNDY, MFB ;
HOOD, J ;
NEWMAN, GB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1978, 85 (07) :481-486
[10]   EVALUATION OF 3 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FETAL WEIGHT [J].
HILL, LM ;
BRECKLE, R ;
WOLFGRAM, KR ;
OBRIEN, PC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1986, 14 (03) :171-178